Thursday, December 12, 2013

And Managers Can No Longer Hand in Lineup Cards Because the Ump Might Get a Papercut

On January 16th, Major League Baseball is expected to announce a rule outlawing running into the catcher. It's pretty much a done deal and according to most reports they will have the blessing of the player's association. Even if the player's association tells them to shove this horrendous decision in their obviously puckered little asses, MLB can unilaterally impose the rule starting in 2015.So that should give them plenty of time to find the appropriate spokesperson. Let me suggest Dennis Haysbert. He's articulate, likable, and he's already a mouthpiece for an insurance company, and insurance companies are the only possible explanation as to why MLB is making this move.
We may allegedly be in good hands with Haysbert's bosses, but baseball fans are in lousy hands with Selig and the aging bobbleheads running MLB.
In a sport that has lost market share to MMA's brutal violence and NASCAR's potential for fiery disaster, they are altering the ability of a player to attempt to score because of the slight possibility someone might get injured. 
"This is, I think, in response to a few issues that have arisen," MLB Exec. VP of baseball operations Sandy Alderson said in a press conference. "One is just the general occurrence of injuries from these incidents at home plate that affects players, both runners and catchers -- and also the general concern about concussions that exists not only in baseball but throughout professional sports and amateur sports today."
They sure aren't doing it because the fans want it removed-check any online poll and the fans pretty solidly want runner/catcher contact kept in the game. 
This is a sport that has pandered to fans incessantly and ad nauseum since the work stoppages. I don't want another sausage race, Bud Selig, I want the guy racing around home to score any way possible this side of being nudged by the giant doughnut that races on the Jumbotron so my section can win a coupon I'll never use. We don't come to the ballpark for a dollar off a cruller, you crusty old nightmare, we come to see exciting baseball. And a guy barreling around third with the winning run on his cleats is  the definition of it.
Now MLB is pandering to the companies that insure the eight figure a year contracts of the players and who obviously want to take a risk away. Bud Selig and his cohorts won't admit it, but it's absolutely true. You could see the writing on the radiology room wall when San Francisco's wonder boy backstop and queen heartthrob Buster Posey got his leg busted when he got clobbered by the Florida Marlins' Scott Cousins on a play at the plate. The play, it should be noted, happened in extra innings. That's right, the game was on the line.

So what happens next year, as you sit in your $125 seat drinking your $9 beer? That remains to be seen, but under the proposed new rule the runner cannot collide with the catcher; he must slide. The catcher will no longer be allowed to block the plate-that's right, for all intents and purposes, he'll be asked to step to the side of the plate to attempt to tag the runner out.
It's like the classic cartoon with the two annoyingly polite chipmunks. "After you". "No, I insist, after you".
This is not like the argument against fighting in hockey, where it's a traditional part of the game, affects the ability of the stars to skate freely, but almost never directly involves scoring. MLB is changing a fundamental way a run is scored. 
And I've heard claims that those who are in favor of keeping the play in the game are motivated by some sense of machismo. No, sorry, Dr. Phil, that's not the case. Sports fans who live for contact have moved on to the other sports I've already mentioned or never strayed from hockey in the first place, no matter how hard Gary Bettman has tried to chase them out of the village with a flaming puck. This issue has to do with attempting to win a baseball game, and due to a few high profile incidents, both the offensive and defensive player are being robbed of one of the most effective and (yes, exciting) ways of scoring or preventing a run. There are supposed to be risks involved, otherwise chess would be a popular spectator sport. Jeezus, little girls are paralyzed every year cheerleading. Buster Posey's gruesome, horrible, catastrophic injury ? He recovered to be MVP the very next year. 
I don't care where Allstate stands. I care that someone who makes ten million a year to stand in an outfield and adjust his crotch is occasionally given the opportunity to round the base at third, put it into high gear and attempt to make the guy in the body armor drop the baseball so the team I root for (or bet on) can win. That's where I stand.

5 comments:

  1. I'm with you Jim that it should be left alone for pure, unabashed excitement. BUT...if we take away one component from the runner ( legal ability to knock over the catcher ) and one from the catcher ( must not block home plate from runner with his body ) aren't we being fair on both sides? In other words, it's as even as much as plowing into each other was even. There is nothing inherently unfair about the new ruling.
    I would find it interesting to see what the percentages are at a home base collision. How often does the catcher drop the ball? I would bet not very often at all. We may be going on about a spilled martini drop.
    In the course of a possible 6-4-3 or 4-6-3 double, it is exciting to see whether the runner sliding into second is going to be safe.Yes? Of course. I think we will just spread out that excitement now. It's still going to be a gas to see whether the runner's tagged or his slide home was well-timed & in his favor.
    All American sports are going through changes. NFL and concussions, etc.Joe Namath had the knees of a 72 year old man when he was 30 and yet defensemen tried to take it easy on him. Why didn't they try to "take him out?" For the good of the game. I vote that fewer plays in MLB that can "take a player out" will, in the long run, help the game. Besides, this is a done deal. As Friends of Bill say, grant me the balls to get over what I can't change. Er, something like that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it's unnecessary in the first place. Alderson, their own guy said it was "a few instances". That's why I'm convinced they're under pressure from the insurance companies.
    And it's not an equitable deal, because the defensive team would prefer a runner at 3rd with two outs (a situation I will bet you arises at least 66% more the season this is implemented than the 2013 season) considering that a good hitter is only capable of a base hit or better approximately 3 out of every 10 at bats. Ray Fosse is the only catcher I've ever heard of whose career was ended by a play at the plate, and that was decades before all the medical tricks they have now. I'm telling you,there will be stadiums full of disappointed people-some who may never return-and barely a ripple in the amount of games per player lost to injury every season. It's an overreaction.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your blog ate this once, so I'll try again... I played softball, then fast pitch softball for years, best catcher in the league - and generally a target for the bigger girls (some of those fast pitch bitches were HUGE, plus there was a lot of lying so coaches could get some bigger more experienced players on their teams so birth dates were frequently lied about so you might have a couple players on some teams that belonged in the next age group up... as the smallest kid in the league against some huge girls - the smaller girls got weeded out for fast pitch - instant target due to size, and being MVP 5 years running, occasionally had to remind the other teams that I could aim my hits by nailing a line drive at the pitchers head if they were actively trying to kill me too much, played catch and NO ONE got past me, and I could just as easily get my 110lbs of flying fury past any other catcher in the league), never got injured body checking someone at home plate, and we had crappy worn out Detroit league protective gear.... Only injuries I ever caused were a broken arm to a twit who was walking too close to the batter's box while I was warming up (candidate for a Darwin award there, if I wasn't small, I'd have taken her head off, I wasn't the only person warming up, and people were screaming at her to not walk so close to the batters box) and a pitcher who got a bump on the head because she didn't duck when I hit one of those intentional line drives... never any injuries around the plate. Dumb rule.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also: girls softball is a far more vicious sport than any sport played by men. And still no home plate injuries.

      Delete
  4. It's as simple as this. If you don't want yr player to get hurt. TELL HIM NOT TO BLOCK THE PLATE. The reason the runner bowls over the catcher, is because he is in his way. Johnny Bench swipe tagged to avoid collisions. It's a choice. It's also one of the most exiting plays in what most people call a slow boring game. It rarely happens, and with proper technique can have an injury avoided. Most people forget the many catchers that came out in the press after the Posey incident to say that he did not set up properly, and that is why he got hurt. Bottom line, if teams want to protect their investments, tell their catchers to swipe tag. If not, buck up and get ready.


    J.P.

    ReplyDelete